Oklahoma's U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn Coburn, Phillips Continue Quest Against Earmarks
The Journal Record › September 25, 2006
Linked as:
The Journal Record › September 25, 2006
Linked as:Summary
Before Oklahoma's U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn challenged Congress' spending on "earmarks" last year, political strategist Tim Phillips said he didn't really know what earmarks were. Today, Phillips serves as president of Washington, D.C.-based Americans for Prosperity Foundation, touring the country in an effort to make members of Congress more accountable and responsible in their spending practices.
"Not every project that is funded with an earmark is necessarily a waste of money, but the practice of earmarking makes it much easier for boondoggles like the $223 million 'Bridge to Nowhere' to slip through," said Phillips. "Let's end earmarks and have an open debate about how we should spend our tax dollars."See the full content of this document
Extract
Oklahoma's U.S. Sen. Tom Coburn Coburn, Phillips Continue Quest Against Earmarks
Lawmakers have increasingly engaged in the practice of earmarking, designating federal dollars for specific projects in members' home d...
See the full content of this document
Sponsored links
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
ver las páginas en versión mobile | web
© Copyright 2012, vLex. All Rights Reserved.
Contents in vLex United States
Explore vLex
For Professionals
For Partners
Company
Other documents:
Digital Photo Sharing and Lower Print Prices Drive Online Photo Service Usage, According to a New Report by InfoTrends/CAP Ventures. | Risk Management and Shareholders' Value in Banking Includes a Complete, Up-to-Date Introduction to Basel II, Value... | Veteran execs join brokerage. | Bio-Imaging Technologies Announces First Quarter 2005 Financial Results. | decisión de tribunal segundo de primera instancia en funciones de control de sucre extensión carupano de july 11 2006 | decisión de juzgado primero de primera instancia en lo civil, mercantil y del tránsito de portuguesa (extensión acarigua), de may 04, 2006 | Decisión nº 592-06 de Tribunal Duodécimo de Control de Zulia (Extensión Maracaibo), de February 25, 2006 | Decisión de Tribunal Cuarto de Control de Miranda, de February 01, 2006